Why Netflix Can’t Afford Its Hardline Abortion Stance


READ MORE


It’s the worst time possible for the streaming giant to pick a side in the Culture Wars.


Netflix boasts far more than just buzz-worthy content.


The streaming giant enjoys enormous public goodwill. Offer a crush of high quality programming along with classic fare for a modest fee – which just jumped to $12.99/month – and patrons will sing your praises.


Better yet, Netflix is easily consumed on smart phones, tablets, streaming devices and smart TVs. Is it any wonder people connect with the brand?


“Netflix and chill” didn’t enter the lexicon by accident.


It’s a success story that could hit some bumps this year. Both ATT and Disney are prepping their own streaming services, fueled by their respective content libraries 


Netflix’s biggest woes may be self-inflicted, though. The company is jumping head first into the Culture Wars.




The company’s leftward lurch caught Twitter nation’s attention months ago. Now, its positions are moving beyond social media. Consider:


  • That mega production deal with former President Barack Obama

  • Drafting former Obama administration official Susan Rice onto its Board of Directors.

  • A parade of left-leaning to far-left fare – including “Patriot Act,” woke Chelsea Handler projects, documentaries like “Knock Down the House” and more.

  • Netflix ‘s Chief Content Officer Ted Sarandos declaring war on Georgia for the state’s new anti-abortion laws.

That last bullet point may matter most.


This isn’t a content provider producing a few liberal shows. It’s a company making a statement on the hottest hot-button issue of our age.


Abortion.


What was once a nonpartisan brand is morphing into something else – a very loud voice for Progressive America.


National Review’s Kyle Smith analyzes Netflix’s pro-choice fight from a pragmatic point of view.


“Netflix is an unusual kind of Hollywood studio in that it is spending money at a rate that would make Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez blanch,” he argues before citing the twin streaming competitors heading our way. “The last thing Netflix needs is to be creating problems for itself by pulling out of Georgia and forsaking all those yummy tax subsidies.”


That’s why Georgia matters in the first place. The state offers incentives for Hollywood to drop by the Peach State for a spell. That directly contradicts the film industry’s progressive groupthink. They promote higher taxes at every turn but flee to states with basement-level tax structures.


Smith thinks cooler heads will prevail and Netflix, along with other studios and stars, won’t give up the state’s alluring fiscal truths.


He could be right.


Still, this fight is going public. Netflix users are hearing the debate in real time, and some are speaking back with their wallets and purses.






Do those Tweets represent a movement or a cultural blip? We’ll see.


What’s clear is the damage Netflix could be doing to its image. There’s plenty of liberal content out there, from specific shows to platforms like MSNBC. Much of it thrives on its own terms. HBO leans to the left, and has done so for some time. Still, it offers quality content and snares enough subscribers to make it profitable.


“The Late Show” with Stephen Colbert rules the talk show realm, in part, because the TV landscape is more fractured than during the Carson/Letterman era. A smaller, passionate audience keeps Team Colbert grinning.


Will the same be enough for a streaming giant like Netflix?


The company seems ill-prepared to alienate a large chunk of its potential audience at this point in its growth. Remember the gobs of cash it spends for original content? Add those two new competitors into the mix and the streaming wars have begun.


A contributor to Forbes.com recently argued Netflix “is not the future of TV” in a viral op-ed.


The company spent $12 billion developing original shows last year. It released 88% more original programming in 2018 than it did the previous year.


And spending on original shows and movies is expected to hit $15 billion this year …


To fund its new shows, Netflix is borrowing huge sums of debt. It currently owes creditors $10.4 billion, which is 59% more than it owed this time last year.


The problem is that no matter how much Netflix spends, it has no chance to catch up with its biggest rival…


Other voices quickly rushed in, saying those doom and gloom predictions are off the mark.


Maybe.


Few, if any, observers are mentioning the ideological elephant in the room. Netflix’s progressive turn could be the game changer when it comes to its future. Ironically, neither the company nor most media outlets appear aware of the threat.


That doesn’t make it any less real.


Suhyeon Choi


Article source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sbsnews-topstories/~3/O5z3TUc4vLM/moment-of-truth-for-macron-in-yellow-vest-showdown

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

One Nation's Malcolm Roberts wants migration rate more than halved

Image
READ MORE Australia’s yearly intake of skilled migrants and their families should be radically cut to just 70,000, according to One Nation’s top Senate candidate in Queensland. The current cap has been set at 190,000 since 2011, but the actual intake fell to its lowest level in a decade under the Coalition government  during the past financial year, with just 163,000 permanent arrivals. Mr Roberts will lead the One Nation ticket in the Senate in the party’s traditional stronghold state of Queensland at the next federal election, which is due to take place by May. He was ejected from parliament earlier in the year when the High Court found he held a dual citizenship, in breach of Section 44 of the Constitution. Party leader Pauline Hanson has a six-year term and her seat will not be in contested. One Nation is known for its anti-immigration policies, but will need to compete with rivals like Katter’s Australia Party, whose members have called for a public vote on a potential return to
Read more

World Cup Central: Dhoni, Akhtar, Botham in All Blacks all-time cricket XV

READ MORE Facebook Twitter Facebook Messenger Pinterest Email print World Cup fever has crossed platforms. There was Harry Kane sneaking into India’s training sessions to meet Virat Kohli. And now there’s the All Blacks picking a XV made up of past and present cricketers. With the @cricketworldcup underway in England, we’ve taken a look at all the best players from past and present to select the ultimate Cricket XV! SQUAD NOTES https://t.co/B3rnj5OBuJ #CWC19 pic.twitter.com/KuUtPU77PT — All Blacks (@AllBlacks) June 2, 2019 And they’ve got some pretty cool reasons for picking some pretty cool players. Curtly Ambrose : If anyone wants to argue with this selection then take it up with Sir Curtly himself. We dare you. MS Dhoni : The Richie McCaw of Cricket. Enough said. Dwayne Leverock : Famous for his one-handed catch at the 2003 World Cup, the 130kg Bermudian would surely make just as big a splash on the rugby field. Jofra Archer runs in to bowl  Getty Images June 1 Archer the fastes
Read more

Stevie J Accuses Ex Joseline Of Alienating Him From Daughter, 2, & Moving To Miami With Another Man

Image
READ MORE ‘LHH’ star Stevie J is battling his ex Joseline Hernandez over their daughter Bonnie Bella, 2. The music producer’s going after full custody of the toddler – and he wants child support. Stevie J , 47, is accusing Joseline Hernandez , 32, of preventing him from seeing his daughter Bonnie Belle Hernandez , 2, in the latest round in their custody battle. In court papers filed on May 14, the Love Hip Hop: Atlanta star accused his ex of engaging in “parental alienation” and of living part-time with a “male companion” in Miami. It was only a year ago that Stevie and Joseline reached a prior custody agreement after a long court battle over Bonnie Bella. They agreed to joint physical custody of the toddler with Joseline retaining primary custody. But now, Stevie has changed his mind. In court papers, which were obtained by HollywoodLife , Stevie accuses Joseline of purposely blocking him from seeing his two-year-old daughter. “The respondent (Joseline) has engaged in acts of parent
Read more