Prosecution of Witness K and his lawyer is a disgraceful act of revenge


READ MORE

When these proceedings could not be avoided, Australia changed its tune, co-operating with a process which produced a treaty that is very favourable to Australia and which, crucially, allows Australia to trumpet its commitment to “international legal order” in contrast to China’s activities in the South China Sea. The hypocrisy is brazen and shameful.


No doubt fearing that action against Witness K and Collaery would jeopardise the treaty, the Australian government waited until it was signed, then sought revenge. It did so just as the Parliament passed the National Security Legislation Amendment (Espionage and Foreign Interference) Bill, which includes “economic relations with another country” within its expansive definition of national security, further restricting public access to information.


The prosecution is a disgrace. Witness K and Bernard Collaery deserve to be honoured, not charged.


David Dixon is a professor at UNSW Law.


Article source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sbsnews-topstories/~3/LOqv7MDfMWc/one-year-on-here-s-what-mueller-s-russia-probe-has-achieved

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

One Nation's Malcolm Roberts wants migration rate more than halved

World Cup Central: Dhoni, Akhtar, Botham in All Blacks all-time cricket XV

Banned Bancroft's journey of self-discovery